On 06/11/2007, Jerry D. Hedden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The attached patches fix this bug.  Thank to Dean Arnold for the
> suggestion to use a PL_ function pointer.

OK. The blead.patch can go in without problems: it does nothing and
prepares binary compatibilty for upcoming 5.10.x and upcoming CPAN
releases of threads::shared. But the shared.patch itself might be a
bit dangerous to put in bleadperl this late, knowing that it could
always be upgraded from CPAN ? What do you think ?

Reply via email to