On 06/11/2007, Jerry D. Hedden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The attached patches fix this bug. Thank to Dean Arnold for the > suggestion to use a PL_ function pointer.
OK. The blead.patch can go in without problems: it does nothing and prepares binary compatibilty for upcoming 5.10.x and upcoming CPAN releases of threads::shared. But the shared.patch itself might be a bit dangerous to put in bleadperl this late, knowing that it could always be upgraded from CPAN ? What do you think ?