On 11/6/07, Rafael Garcia-Suarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 06/11/2007, Jerry D. Hedden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The attached patches fix this bug. Thank to Dean Arnold for the > > suggestion to use a PL_ function pointer. > > OK. The blead.patch can go in without problems: it does nothing and > prepares binary compatibilty for upcoming 5.10.x and upcoming CPAN > releases of threads::shared. But the shared.patch itself might be a > bit dangerous to put in bleadperl this late, knowing that it could > always be upgraded from CPAN ? What do you think ?
I plan to release the updated threads::shared to CPAN if you incorporate these patches into blead. However, there is no compatibility issues: the two patches will work with or without each other. You can see this by noting the #ifdef PL_destroyhook in shared.xs.
