On 13/3/06 9:27, Graham Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, March 13, 2006 2:17 pm, Chris Ridd wrote: > >> (Adrian sent me the debug output direct.) >> >> It looks quite like the server was sending mangled BER. The LDAP result >> was >> actually very large (so the byte offsets logged were OK), but the server >> suddenly decided to send a PrintableString value instead of an OCTET >> STRING >> value, and it got even more confused from there on... > > Hm, that alone should not cause an issue. I was expecting some length byte
Well, PrintableString != OCTET STRING, so the decode will fail. But you're right, it should not whinge so publicly. It did get horribly out of sync further on. > to be wrong. Chris, can you forward the packet to me, I would like to take > a look too. Sure. Cheers, Chris
