On 2008-04-08 at 19:45 -0500, Graham Barr wrote: > My view is the opposite. the person most familiar with the fix is the > best person not to "break it", especially in the absence of test
Well, a test would be to use the code and check error codes, since it couldn't ever have worked against a real server. :^( > Ack, another module caught by a change in Module::Install. I have > checked in a fix Okay, builds now, and I can see that revision 89 fixed DIGEST-MD5 in February too. Any chance of a release soon please? Thanks, -Phil
pgpvuw5D7t3YM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
