Wonderful! It is curious that there should be so many *new* tests that assume ASCII given that in 2001 or so all tests passed (either really, or were appropriately skipped) in z/OS or its moral equivalent. Or maybe my memory is selective
I would be most interested in some breakdown analysis of these newly failing tests. On Mar 15, 2013 2:59 PM, "Karl Williamson" <[email protected]> wrote: > Perl now will compile and run on z/OS, requiring a couple of work-arounds > to do so. It fails our tests massively, and there are clearly a number of > things wrong. But I believe it is basically working except for Unicode and > /i regular expression matching. John and I are continuing to plug away at > it. > > Many of the tests are written so that no non-ASCII platform could succeed, > so that its failing them badly is not indicative of how well it really > works. >
