On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote:

> Uggg.  No, there's no good way to handle this now unless there's some
> way $Num_Tests can make itself shared between forks.

Well, I do keep track of it in my code and pass it around between forks.
What I need is a way to set it.

> In the general sense, there is a good solution to this problem.
> First, there's the 'no_plan' feature of Test::More, so you can run an
> indeterminate number of tests.  Second, Test::Harness allows you to
> use unnumbered tests, however, there's currently no support for
> this in Test::Simple/More.

I don't want to use the no_plan feature.  That would be a step backwards
for my test suite (I _know_ how many tests are in each fork).

> It's on the TODORSN list.

Just tell me how you want the interface to look and I'll gladly write it.
I want to use Test::More in the next release of Alzabo so I'm motivated.


-dave

/*==================
www.urth.org
We await the New Sun
==================*/

Reply via email to