On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 02:24:23 +0000, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Also, for those who aren't happy with the fact that Test::Builder is a hard > singleton with its state held in a bunch of file-scoped lexicals (hard to > debug) reset() made me collect together all those state variables in one > point in the source making it much easier someone to convert them into > object data, if they feel so inclined. I'm not yet convinced its a good > idea.
We *could* add a method called really_create_a_new_builder() that doesn't have the singleton properties, but what problem does that solve? As long as we're stuck with test numbers, we have to try not to confuse Test::Harness. -- c
