Re: Why t/TEST and not Test::Harness?

[schwern]

On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 07:20:55PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Why is t/TEST anything more than a thin wrapper around Test::Harness?
> 
> Because t/TEST pre-dates Test::Harness by years, and no one has got 
> round to changing 'make test' call the new style.

Is that it?  Historical reasons?

Would anyone scream if I gave a shot at gutting TEST?