Re: Why t/TEST and not Test::Harness?

[Andy Dougherty]

On Sun, 18 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 07:20:55PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >Why is t/TEST anything more than a thin wrapper around Test::Harness?
> > 
> > Because t/TEST pre-dates Test::Harness by years, and no one has got 
> > round to changing 'make test' call the new style.
> 
> Is that it?  Historical reasons?

Mostly, yes.
 
> Would anyone scream if I gave a shot at gutting TEST?

Please make sure 'make minitest' works.  And also think about what happens
if 'use' is broken :-).

-- 
    Andy Dougherty              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    Dept. of Physics
    Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042