Re: [RFC] adding skip option directly to plan()

[Randy W. Sims]

Andy Lester wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:33:48AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
wrote:
  plan tests => 14, have( "Foo::Wango" ), moon_phase eq "waning",
etc;

All this means is that all the following conditions have to be true.
HOW those get evaluated is left to the future.  We're not locked into
anything.
   plan tests => 14, have( "Foo" ), moon_phase eq "waning";
would be the same as
   if ( have("Foo") && moon_phase eq "waning" ) ) {
       plan tests => 14;
    }
plan tests => 14, if => have( "Foo" ) && moon_phase eq "waning";