plan tests => 14, if => have( "Foo" ) && moon_phase eq "waning";
The downside here, as Geoff alluded to, is that we don't really want the
short circuiting behaviour of &&, since evaluating the operands may give
useful information as to why the tests are being skipped.
That's fine. You can do this:
plan tests => 14, have("Foo"), moon_phase eq "waning";
-- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
