On 4/23/06, H.Merijn Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 12:07:18 +0100, Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > On 23 Apr 2006, at 07:02, Andy Lester wrote: > > [snip] > > > I've removed the meaningless percentages of tests that have > > > failed. If you rely on the output at the end, it's different now. > > [snip] > > > > I'll just repeat what I left on Andy's blog here in case anybody > > agrees with me. > > > > ---- > > I don't like the change myself. I'm bright enough to figure out that > > anything less than 100% pass is bad when developing. > > > > When using other peoples test suites seeing, for example, 99% ok > > tells me something very different from seeing 3% ok. For me the > > difference between "nearly there apart form this bit of functionality > > that I don't care about" and "completely f**ked" is useful. Yes I can > > figure it out from the test/pass numbers - but the percentage gives > > me a handy overview. Math is hard! :-) > > > > Not something I feel /that/ strongly about - but I don't see the > > utility of the change myself (beyond code simplification in T::H). > > ---- > > > > (probably just me :-) > > I did not follow the rest of the conversation, but I strongly agree to the > above statement.
Fwiw, me too. -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"
