On 15/08/06, Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 14 Aug 2006, at 21:53, Ovid wrote:
[snip]
> My personal thought is that either Andy Lester or Schwern start
> such a mailing list.  Then we need to contact the major players
> from other languages and get them to join and see how we can make
> TAP a more widely accepted protocol.  We know the benefits of it.
> Now I recommend that we convince others of those benefits so we can
> "share the wealth", so to speak.

To be honest, I'm not entirely sure that I could come up with a
really convincing argument for TAP for an audience using JUnit,
TestNG and similar...

XUnit allows heirarchical grouping, TAP does not. DUnit (Delphi's
XUnit) comes with a GUI that shows you a tree of tests/groups,

F


Do we have a convincing argument? Maybe I'm just being overly
pessimistic today :-)

> If anyone likes this idea, I've been accepted to attend Google's
> Automated Testing Conference in London (http://
> googleresearch.blogspot.com/2006/04/our-conference-on-automated-
> testing.html) and I can see what I can do to recruit people. (I was
> notified of my acceptance considerably later than they said I would
> be, so it's possible my work might interfere).

Bah. They didn't like me :-)

Adrian

Reply via email to