--- Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like Wstat, even if I don't have Stat. I like to know if tests > coredumped. > I may be in a minority here, but being able to optionally switch to > that output is useful.
Fair enough. > I like the prominence of TODO passed Cool. I hated wedging it in there like that, but I couldn't think of another nice format. > I'm not sure if I like the lines making the table. I guess it's a bit > of a > bikeshed, but having horizontal lines between each will increase the > amount > of vertical space needed to convey the same information, which will > mean > fewer failures will be needed to exceed my screen's height. So with optional Wstat, you're thinking something like this? Failed Test | Wstat | Total | Fail | List of Failed | TODO Passed ------------+-------+-------+------+--------------------+---------------- t/bar.t | 1024| 13| 4|2, 6-8 |3-4 t/foo.t | 256| 10| 1|5 | And Andy Lester wrote: > The vertical lines are just noise. What Tufte calls "chartjunk". That's what I thought at first, too, but looks at this: Failed Test Total Fail List of Failed TODO Passed ------------+-------+------+---------------------+---------------- t/bar.t 13 9 2, 6-8, 13, 17, 33-35 3-4 t/foo.t 10 10 5, 19, 27, 37-38, 117 9-11 In trying to pack in the 'TODO passed' information, I'm running out of room. That's becoming annoying to read (It would be even worse without those plus signs: Failed Test Total Fail List of Failed TODO Passed ------------------------------------------------------------------ t/bar.t 13 9 2, 6-8, 13, 17, 33-35 3-4 t/foo.t 10 10 5, 19, 27, 37-38, 117 9-11 Did you mean that you didn't like the 'horizontal' lines? -- Cheers, Ovid -- Buy the book -- http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Perl and CGI -- http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
