> OK, well we can talk about that now and at least get an idea of what
> kind of future we're proofing ourselves against. What do people
> envisage that we might want / be able to capture about a test run?
1. Access to both STDERR and STDOUT, in proper order ('prove' jumbles them),
capturable into a variable (T::B snatches away STDERR)
2. Option to inject a clearcut delimiter between tests
i.e. A program for programmers--instead of human-consumption output to
screen--offers output back to the programmer.
Gary
The information contained in this message may be privileged, confidential, and
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message
and deleting it from your computer.
