On 7 Mar 2007, at 16:26, Eric Hacker wrote: [snip]
The first digit can be a grouping by success/failure.
Yes, I see where you're going with this :)
So then if I'm not too far off base with the above, then to use something different than HTTP::Status type codes would be reinventing. 1xx Info 2xx Success 3xx Redirect, probably not applicable to testing 4xx Failure 5xx Server/System Error
As I say I'm broadly in favour of something /like/ this - but we have a clean slate here and it seems kind of arbitrary to commit to using HTTP-like status codes when we don't have to.
-- Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
