# from Michael G Schwern
# on Monday 12 March 2007 04:49 pm:
>If all we do is argue about TAP extensions and never actually produce
> one we will never have to worry about new versions!
That's a good plan. To implement it, we really need a committee.
Perhaps perl-qa is a little overwhelmed with this sort of traffic.
We've already got a tapx-dev list, but perhaps we should form a
tap-design-committee-formation-committee list (of course, we may first
need to form a committee to decide on an acronym for the committee
formation committee.)
--Eric
--
"Insert random misquote here"
---------------------------------------------------
http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------
