# from Andy Lester # on Saturday 25 August 2007 10:21 pm: >I've been out of the Test::Harness 3.0 loop for a while. Months ago >I talked to Ovid about how it'd be good if I tried to get together >some idea of where we are at, and that clearly didn't happen. >... >All the @INC handling, all the determining of how to run each .t >file, all the mucking with PERL5LIB, etc etc etc. I just don't want >to deal with it if T::H 3.0 is coming soon.
I think Ovid aggregated all of T::H bugs into this checklist back in March. http://svn.hexten.net/tapx/trunk/TH_TODO As far as "coming soon", I can't say for certain. I think we're really close, though I would rather see TAP::Harness used "in anger" a bit more (*cough* parrot.) We recently added smoke testing (including "smoked dogfood") and had uncovered a few nits in the last month. So, I would say it is looking pretty good, but that's somewhat peripheral, so fresh sets of eyes (and more everyday usage) would certainly help. What about a few people comparison-smoking CPAN with both harnesses for a few weeks before we call it good? --Eric -- Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --George Santayana --------------------------------------------------- http://scratchcomputing.com ---------------------------------------------------
