Ovid wrote: > Test results currently look something like this: > > t/foo.t................. ok > t/bar.t................. ok > t/baz.t................. 23/? > # Failed test at t/baz.t line 9 > # Looks like you failed 2 tests out of 23 > t/baz.t................. Dubious, test ... > > Why do we do this instead of outputting TAP (using YAML diagnostics)? > > ok 1 - t/foo.t > ok 2 - t/bar.t > not ok 3 - t/baz.t > --- > failed: > - 2 > - 11 > ... > > And we could even add diagnostics for the non-failing tests. This > could be an alternate output, but now instead of external tools having > to try and parse our ad-hoc Test::Harness output, we could have an > alternate machine read-able output that those tools could use. Now if > only we had a useful way to read that output ...
+1 -- Stabbing you in the face for your own good.
