--- Aristotle Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I agree with David on all counts.
> 
> [a-z] seems perfectly sufficient to me, but saying “anything for
> which POSIX `islower` returns true” is acceptably precise.

I'll go along with this.  Can we move forward now? :)

Cheers,
Ovid

--
Buy the book  - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/
Perl and CGI  - http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
Personal blog - http://publius-ovidius.livejournal.com/
Tech blog     - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/

Reply via email to