On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 01:54:02PM +0200, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: > * Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-14 08:00]: > > $ grep -c 'ignore X' ~/.muttrc > > 100 > > > > That's the ones I've collected that I don't care about. And > > some of those are common prefixes. > > You know that you can use wildcards to ignore everything (or just > big swathes of stuff) by default and then selectively unignore > some of non-gunk, right?
No, I didn't, but I'm not looking to do that. I'm curious what the gunk is, without having to remember to look at every message. This way, the new gunk announces itself to me, without me having to go look for it. I think that this has some parallel to testing, but I'm not sure what. I guess it's like testing that no warnings are issued by code, rather than testing that a particular warning (that signals known trouble) is not issued. Nicholas Clark
