Folks, this really, really needs to go to the IETF list. I mentioned in here because the list wasn't set up yet, but IETF list is the official spot for this and we can avoid spamming people here with this. That being said, on with the show! ...
--- On Thu, 21/8/08, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Let's not forget that the debated requirement for > diagnostics is that > > the generators and consumers speak the same language > > Does it have to be just one? Now and forever? I originally argued that we should allow more than one, but I was wrong. We don't know the source of our TAP and if everybody and their dog is speaking a different diagnostic language, we may as well junk diagnostics (that being said, even speaking the same language doesn't mean that everything can translate cleanly. You generally can't specify file/line in a stored procedure emitting TAP) > Is the specification for either of these going to be part > of the TAP spec? Yes. Cheers, Ovid -- Buy the book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Tech blog - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/ Twitter - http://twitter.com/OvidPerl Official Perl 6 Wiki - http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6
