* Ricardo SIGNES <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-21 19:00]: > Ovid (and I) would like it to be JSON, pending any better idea > (that we agree is better).
FWIW, after some consideration, I find myself drifting toward the JSON camp as well. It’s a slow drift, but I just can’t help disliking YAML for making the ultimate mockery of its own initial design goals. (You have no idea how much regret-on-someone- else’s-behalf this has caused me. I would love to be able to like YAML.) > Schwern would like it to be YAML (a superset of JSON), with the > phrasing "consumers MUST understand JSON and SHOULD understand > YAML." I could arrange myself with Schwern’s desire, so long as we could agree to make that SHOULD a MAY. That would in fact work very well for me. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
