On Oct 28, 2008, at 1:09 PM, Salve J Nilsen wrote:
Feel free to suggest a better title. (I won't, because I think there's a motivational value in keeping it as it is.
Salve, I have to ask you to please look at CPANTS and this discussion in general from eyes other than your own. Your derision as "newspeak" of what many others see as "basic civility" isn't helping any. It's clear that you don't care about how people feel, but the vast majority of people are very concerned with how they feel and how they are treated. Many of us are very concerned with how volunteers are treated, because we'd like to keep them around as volunteers.
Aside from that, I have to ask what "motivational value" you see in having a Hall Of Shame under any name. Please describe what scenario you see such that this Hall of Shame will have any effect whatsoever on the Kwalitee of work generated.
Do you imagine that an author of a low-Kwalitee module is going to stumble upon the list and see his or her module on it? The chances of that are miniscule.
Do you imagine that an author of a low-Kwalitee module, upon seeing his or her module on the list, is going to go and modify the distribution? The chances of that are miniscule * tiny.
Most of all, what problem are you trying to solve? I suggest that low- Kwalitee modules on the CPAN pose no problem whatsoever.
xoa -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
