On Jan 22, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
I personally use no_plan only because I can't be bothered to manually count things and don't want to assume that the number of tests run on *my* computer is somehow a universal constant.I'm glad you find no_plan useful. Many others do as well.Perhaps I'm being unclear. I do not find either 'no_plan' or 'plan' tobe useful in their current state.
Yes, but many others do. -- Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance