On Jan 22, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:

I personally use no_plan only because I can't be bothered to
manually count things and don't want to assume that the number of
tests run on *my* computer is somehow a universal constant.

I'm glad you find no_plan useful.  Many others do as well.

Perhaps I'm being unclear. I do not find either 'no_plan' or 'plan' to
be useful in their current state.


Yes, but many others do.

--
Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance



Reply via email to