On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 12:16:33AM +0800, Gaurav Vaidya wrote: > Based on the recent questions on the TAP mailing list asking about the > significance of "1..", I wonder if this could be simplified to: > TAP version 13 > 1..2 # Initialization > ok 1 > ok 2 > 3..6 # Testing individual feeds > ok 3 > ok 4 > ok 5 > ok 6 > 7..7 # Testing cleanup > ok 7 > 0..0 # All done!
Could it be simplified further like this? TAP version 13 1..2 # Initialization ok 1 ok 2 +4 # Testing individual feeds ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok 6 ... Although presumably it's up to Test::Something to turn my "plan four more tests" into "3..6" so from the user's point of view they're the same. -- David Cantrell | Cake Smuggler Extraordinaire
