I actually put a link to the FAQ at the very first mail I sent.It does not address my questions, it gives examples that say "we can't count tests ahead of time, its impossible". But I just want you to change the approach from "ahead of time" into "realtime" or something ... like all the other testing frameworks do it.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Ovid <publiustemp-perl...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > From: Gabor Szabo <szab...@gmail.com> > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Evgeny wrote: > > > If my script ended early, because maybe even a core dump ... the I wont > > > care. It's just another case of a failed test that cant be reported by > > > Test::More, but a human looking at the screen will hopefully understand > what > > > happened. > > > > Human? > > > > Why would a human look at a test report that says "everything is ok"? > > Don't we have a FAQ about this somewhere? Evgeny's questions are quite > reasonable, but we're answering them every few months. It would be nice to > link to a FAQ and be done with it. > > > Cheers, > Ovid > -- > Buy the book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ > Tech blog - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/ > Twitter - http://twitter.com/OvidPerl > Official Perl 6 Wiki - http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6 > >
