* On Mon, Jul 13 2009, Ovid wrote:
> How would Smolder (which we're not using since we use Hudson) help
> with this?  With over 15,000 tests being reported for t/aggregate.t, I
> think a drill-down would be problematic here. Plus, tying the TODO to
> the appropriate test file being aggregated is needed.  Thus, I thought
> about a BAILOUT or forced failure for the TODO at that point.

Can't you just put the TAP into a database, and do a quick query to
extract the file, test number, and line of passing TODO tests?  Surely
some code might need to be written, but it doesn't sound too hard.

--
print just => another => perl => hacker => if $,=$"

Reply via email to