* On Mon, Jul 13 2009, Ovid wrote: > How would Smolder (which we're not using since we use Hudson) help > with this? With over 15,000 tests being reported for t/aggregate.t, I > think a drill-down would be problematic here. Plus, tying the TODO to > the appropriate test file being aggregated is needed. Thus, I thought > about a BAILOUT or forced failure for the TODO at that point.
Can't you just put the TAP into a database, and do a quick query to extract the file, test number, and line of passing TODO tests? Surely some code might need to be written, but it doesn't sound too hard. -- print just => another => perl => hacker => if $,=$"