On 03/30/2017 05:16 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
On 31 March 2017 at 09:36, James E Keenan <jkee...@pobox.com> wrote:
For example, today David Golden prepared a new version of Sub::Uplevel --
the #1 distro in the order of battle.  Once he releases that to CPAN, a
tremendous number of downstream distros will have their prerequisites
satisfied and -- assuming they don't have their own configure/build/test
failures -- will become installable via this perl-5.26.0-friendly cpanm.


Neat... but Q) Looking at your list I see a few things that I expected
to be fixed already.

Are you using a Mini-CPAN Mirror by chance?


No, though I certainly could, since I have a minicpan on the same machine. I'd just have to remember that I have it and then keep it up-to-date.

So what you see is as of earlier today from cpan. I suspect that one of the biggest challenges we will face is getting people to do an actual release as opposed to, say, merging a p.r. to their github master branch.

If I had/have time to do a more sophisticated version of this, I'd figure out a way to distinguish between those distros that truly sit at the top of "error trees" -- Sub::Uplevel and Sub::Identify, for instance -- and those which may have many distros failing underneath them but where the real failure is above them -- e.g., Devel::OverloadInfo.

jimk

Reply via email to