On 04/04/2017 05:37 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
On 5 April 2017 at 08:28, James E Keenan <jkee...@pobox.com> wrote:
the tip of the order of battle looks substantially different
I must say though, your results confuse me.
In my testing, the things that are holding back the most are ...
Module::Runtime , and Task::Weaken.
But neither of those are even *ON* your list.
They wouldn't be on my list if they were successfully installed.
Module::Runtime was successfully installed all three times -- though
that's actually two times, because my first run used an earlier perl 5
blead commit. Each of the three runs used a different, progressively
newer version of 'cpanm'.
Task::Weaken did not succeed on my first run (20170330). It failed here:
#####
Can't locate inc/Module/Install.pm in @INC (you may need to install the
inc::Module::Install module) (@INC contains:
/home/jkeenan/testing/blead/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.25.11/x86_64-linux
/home/jkeenan/testing/blead/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.25.11
/home/jkeenan/testing/blead/lib/perl5/5.25.11/x86_64-linux
/home/jkeenan/testing/blead/lib/perl5/5.25.11) at Makefile.PL line 42.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 42.
-> N/A
-> FAIL Configure failed for Task-Weaken-1.04. See
/home/jkeenan/.cpanm/work/1490881305.4413/build.log for details.
#####
However, Task::Weaken succeeded on the second run -- where I was working
with a more recent blead and with App-cpanminus v1.7042 -- and was
therefore already installed in time for the third run.
So, the only thing I can offer is: Are you working with (a) a recent
enough blead to capture all the changes relevant to no-dot; and (b) the
very most recent version of cpanm?
Thank you very much.
Jim Keenan
