Hello Dan! Anton> Ooops, here goes the patch :-)
DK> I will apply and fix some. Thanks, I see it there :-) Dan, what should we do about the L<...> in Please feel free to send your comments, disagreements and additions to L<...>. ? I meant this to replaced by some mail address. Probably [EMAIL PROTECTED], or your address, or mine.. Or if we do not provide any I meant this abstract to be wiped away. Your opinion? - Anton P.S. Actually I was worried about saying things like "... are totally valid encodings but not registered at IANA. The names under which they are listed here are probably the most widely-known names for these encodings and are recommended names." I hoped that if I have said anything wrong in this section, people, probably completely unrelated to our mailing lists, would correct my mistakes and say, for example: no, 'GB 12345' is not 'the recommended' name, you should recommend 'GB12345' or Encode also supports encoding 'xyz' but you have forgotten to classify it. It fits well into category 'bbb' (needs a new category) That was the intention behind that last abstract on the info being 'fragile'.
