On Monday, March 25, 2002, at 09:30 , Anton Tagunov wrote:
> Thanks, I see it there :-)
>
> Dan, what should we do about the L<...> in
>
> Please feel free to send your comments, disagreements and
> additions to L<...>.

   0.98 or above does use L<> for URIs;  As Autrijus URI support for L<> 
is ex officio now.  But I have found podchecker5.7.3 warn on URIsh 
entries in L<>.  But since the source af authority on L<> is is in 
perlpod, I decided it is podchecker that needs to be fixed.   Maybe I 
can write a patch if I have time for that.  For the time being, I will 
add Brad Appleton to the recipient list of this mail.
   Brad, perlpod in breadperl explictly states that;

>            Or you can link to a web page:
>
>            o   "L<scheme:...>"
>
>                Links to an absolute URL.  For example,
>                "L<http://www.perl.org/>".  But note that there is
>                no corresponding "L<text|scheme:...>" syntax, for
>                various reasons.

   Yet podchecker5.7.3 goes like this for URIs;

 > podchecker5.7.3 JP/JP.pm
*** WARNING: node 'http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/unicode-
symbols.html.en' contains non-escaped | or / at line 83 in file JP/JP.pm
JP/JP.pm pod syntax OK.

   This definitely needs to be fixed.

Dan the Encode Maintainer

Reply via email to