On approximately 11/13/2003 5:38 PM, came the following characters from
the keyboard of Erick Bourgeois:

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:44:08 -0800, Glenn Linderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:


Perhaps we should try and move forward somehow. I've just looked through the mailing list and there are several other bug fixes that should be applied to any new build.

In the short term,

1) I'd be glad to contribute my fixes to anyone that cares, that would be willing to CVS-ize them, and make them generally available.


I would be more than willing to bring the files together and serve
them up on jeb.ca

Not sure whether this includes CVS-ing them? I'm guessing that it doesn't, but would do the other half, of making them generally available.

2) I'd be willing to make available my binary distribution to anyone that wants my fixes (I've called it 0.0.668, since there were 3 fixes applied to 0.0.665), but I'm working on 0.0.669, adding more keys to the legal set of accelerator keys... all keys are legal accelerator keys to Windows, and only a subset were implemented in Win32::GUI.

So would you put the .ppd and .tar.gz files up to, in a manner that PPM could use?

3) I'd be willing to incorporate patches into my version, if someone identifies them, and sends me the patches, they aren't too cumbersome to apply, and make the merged binary distribution available.


Then there is the documentation project headed up by Erick Bourgeois (http://jeb.ca/perl/win32-gui-docs/index.pl/home). We just need to get some momentum going...

Accelerator keys could use more documentation now that I have them working.


Glenn, since you have fixed the bugs and are most familar (perhaps) with the 
code
at this point, could you do the editing? Do you mind creating an account with my documentation content manager? This way I could set your priviledge to
"Content Manager" and you could make all the changes you want to accelerator 
keys.

I created the account and sent you a private note about that. It depends on how hard it is to learn your process for updating information. I'm trying to stay heads down on a project to get it done... but for sure after that I'd be willing to update.

--
Glenn -- http://nevcal.com/
===========================
Like almost everyone, I receive a lot of spam every day, much of it
offering to help me get out of debt or get rich quick.  It's ridiculous.
-- Bill Gates

And here is why it is ridiculous:
The division that includes Windows posted an operating profit of $2.26 billion on revenue of $2.81 billion. --from Reuters via http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/031113/tech_microsoft_msn_1.html

So that's profit of over 400% of revenue... with a bit more investment in Windows technology, particularly in the area of reliability, the percentage gain might go down, but so might the bugs and security problems? Seems like it would be a reasonable tradeoff. WalMart earnings are 3.4% of revenue.


Reply via email to