On Mon, 22 May 2000 06:49:10 -0700, Nick Arnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>At 09:14 AM 5/22/00 -0400, you wrote:
>>I have no idea what this means, but...
>>...
>>Now, it seems to me that the NewLove virus is newer than the release 611
>>installer, so this seems really strange. Perhaps Norton's is looking for a
>>particular sequence of bytes that it thinks indicates the presence of this
>>virus, and the file listed just happens to have that sequence of bytes in
>>it. Or is it possible that I really have the virus?
>
>NAV reported to me yesterday that the same file, but I haven't tried to
>figure it out. I wasn't installing, this was just a routine virus scan.
>Since nothing else is reported as infected, perhaps this is a false
>alarm. I quarantined the file just to be sure. Anyone else?
Yes, it is a bogus warning. This is a plain text HTML file, so you can
check it yourself if you want to. BTW, this is mentioned in the release
notes. :-)
-Jan
---
You are currently subscribed to perl-win32-users as: [archive@jab.org]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For non-automated Mailing List support, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
