Change 17672 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2002/08/04 01:25:14
Subject: Re: mention of "use sort" botched in perlfunc?
From: Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 13:49:58 -0400 (18:49 BST)
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Affected files ...
.... //depot/perl/pod/perlfunc.pod#353 edit
Differences ...
==== //depot/perl/pod/perlfunc.pod#353 (text) ====
Index: perl/pod/perlfunc.pod
--- perl/pod/perlfunc.pod#352~17634~ Thu Jul 18 14:32:52 2002
+++ perl/pod/perlfunc.pod Sat Aug 3 18:25:14 2002
@@ -4572,7 +4572,7 @@
limited control of the sort. Its rather blunt control of the
underlying algorithm may not persist into future perls, but the
ability to characterize the input or output in implementation
-independent ways quite probably will. See L</use>.
+independent ways quite probably will. See L<sort>.
Examples:
End of Patch.
