Nicholas Clark wrote:
> Well, looks like this wasn't right:
> 
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 01:00:13PM -0700, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>> Change 33480 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2008/03/11 19:45:55
>> 
>>      Subject: Re: Perl @
http://www.ccl4.org/~nick/P/perl-33444.tar.bz2
>>      From: Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>      Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>      Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 20:55:36 +0100
>> 
>>      CYG09 enhance GetCurrentThreadId test
>> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 03:47:00AM +0000, Steve Hay wrote:
>> Automated smoke report for 5.11.0 patch 33500
>> maldoror.bath.planit.group: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6700 @
>>     2.66GHz(~2660 MHz) (x86/2 cpu) on        MSWin32 - WinXP/.Net SP2
>>     using     cl version 13.10.3077
> 
>> ../ext/Win32/t/GetCurrentThreadId.t.........................FAILED
>>     Bad plan.  You planned 1 tests but ran 0.
> 
> 
> Which I infer is down to this:
> 
>     if (my $pid = fork) {
>         waitpid($pid, 0);
>         exit 0;
>     }
> 
> Should that now be moved into the (new)
> 
>     if ($Config{ccflags} =~ /PERL_IMPLICIT_SYS/) {
>         ...
>     }
> 
> block?

Yes. Thanks, applied (somewhat tardily, but not quite a whole week late)
as #33543.

Reply via email to