Rick Delaney wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 12:00:00PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > > On 7/15/05, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > our $x; our $x; # no > > > > > > Its not a mask but its useless and probably an oversight on the part of > > > the programmer. Maybe a "Useless use of our"? Or "Repeated use of our"? > > > > > > I'm fine with dealing with that separately. > > > > There's already the warning ""our" variable %s redeclared" that can be > > re-used for this. > > Right. Do we want the > > "\t(Did you mean \"local\" instead of \"our\"?)\n" > > part for this? It is unlikely that the programmer meant local in this > case.
Good suggestion. I'll have a patch ready soon.
