On 9/5/05, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any other feedback on making > (LIST)[LIST]-> > not need the ->?
I think I like the idea, and the patch seems safe. What I don't like, though, is the lack of tests for this patch. Also, a minor concern is that people might unknowingly write non-backwards-compatible code with 5.10 by using this construct.
