Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > I think I like the idea, and the patch seems safe. What I don't like,
> > though, is the lack of tests for this patch. Also, a minor concern is
> > that people might unknowingly write non-backwards-compatible code with
> > 5.10 by using this construct.
>
> Some basic tests:
Thanks, both patches applied as change #25399.
> As to your minor concern, that may be a reason to not include it in maint.
> (Whether it's a bugfix or enhancement depends on how you interpret the doc.)
I don't know how Nicholas is going to interpret it, but personnally I wouldn't
include it.
--
The man does not exist who, outside his own specialty, is not credulous.
-- Borges
