On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Luke Closs wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 10:40:25PM -0700, Steve Peters via RT wrote:
> > Has anyone looked at this patch yet? I'm assuming that since it was > > written against 5.6.1 rather than the current bleadperl and it isn't in > > diff -u format, a new patch might be needed. > > > > One question comes to mind when I look at it, though. Have you tested > > the patch on a non-Tiger system? > > I haven't tested it on a non-Tiger system (I don't have access to > one). If Merijn doesn't beat me to it, I'll try to look at it in the next couple of days. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]