On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 07:52:06 -0400 (EDT), Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Luke Closs wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 10:40:25PM -0700, Steve Peters via RT wrote: > > > > Has anyone looked at this patch yet? I'm assuming that since it was > > > written against 5.6.1 rather than the current bleadperl and it isn't in > > > diff -u format, a new patch might be needed. > > > > > > One question comes to mind when I look at it, though. Have you tested > > > the patch on a non-Tiger system? > > > > I haven't tested it on a non-Tiger system (I don't have access to > > one). > > If Merijn doesn't beat me to it, I'll try to look at it in the next couple > of days. It was in my queue waiting for someone that could test on Tiger did so It's a rather simple change, but as I don't have access to any MacOS like OS's, I waited for comments -- H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/) using Perl 5.6.2, 5.8.0, 5.8.5, & 5.9.2 on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00 & 11.11, AIX 4.3 & 5.2, SuSE 9.2 & 9.3, and Cygwin. http://www.cmve.net/~merijn Smoking perl: http://www.test-smoke.org, perl QA: http://qa.perl.org reports to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], perl-qa@perl.org
