On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 05:49:39PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > : I take it the existing C<...> operator would be unaffected? > > Essentially. The lexer is (and will continue to be) quite aware of the > difference between terms and operators. Oops, just read this. Ignore my previoius email. -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Do we really need eq? Randal L. Schwartz
- ... as a term Larry Wall
- Re: ... as a term Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: ... as a term Nathan Torkington
- Re: ... as a term skud
- Re: ... as a term Damian Conway
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: ... as a term Damian Conway
- Re: ... as a term Larry Wall
- Re: ... as a term Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Larry Wall
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: ... as a term Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: ... as a term John Porter
- Re: Do we really need eq? Steve Simmons
- Re: Do we really need eq? John Porter
- Re: Do we really need eq? David L. Nicol
- Re: Do we really need eq? Peter Scott
- Re: Do we really need eq? Tom Christiansen