> a design expressed in UML could be > implemented in a non-OO language. Interesting concept... "expressing" perl in UML would certainly add depth to the artistic license ;) > > I think, though, that the core interface should be procedural. > > I agree. We should not confuse OOD with OOP. As in GNOME ?? John
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the ... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl ... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in ... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl recommended reading li... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl recommended reading li... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should Have ... John van V
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should Have ... 'John Porter'
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should Have ... Johan Vromans