Dan Sugalski wrote: > > At 04:17 PM 9/28/00 -0400, John Porter wrote: > > > I think, though, that the core interface should be procedural. > > > >I agree. We should not confuse OOD with OOP. > > Fair enough, and I was. > > I've no experience with UML, though. Got a pointer to a quick overview? Try Martin Fowler's UML Distilled, very good and short! peter
- RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should Have W... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Shou... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl C... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Pe... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components ... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl C... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Pe... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components ... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Compone... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl recommended rea... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl recommended rea... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Shou... John van V