On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 05:40:04PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > You're being too specific. There is no assumption possible that perl > developers will do *anything*. Ever. This is a volunteer community. Any > other assumption you might make is unfounded. David also seems to miss the irony that the people who *can* be expected to work on Perl because they being paid to do so are probably employed by... Anyway, this is generating light. Could someone start generating heat, please? -- Anything to do with HTML processing /usually/ involves a pact with an evil supernatural being, I find. -- Sean Burke
- RE: Continued RFC process David Grove
- Re: Continued RFC process Peter Buckingham
- Re: Continued RFC process Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Continued RFC process Russ Allbery
- Re: Continued RFC process Uri Guttman
- Re: Continued RFC process Nicholas Clark
- Re: Continued RFC process Daniel Chetlin
- Re: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- RE: Continued RFC process David Grove
- RE: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process Simon Cozens
- Re: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process Simon Cozens
- Re: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process Nathan Torkington
- Re: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process Nathan Wiger
- Re: Continued RFC process Stephen Zander
- Re: Continued RFC process Stephen Zander
- Re: Continued RFC process Dan Sugalski
- Re: Continued RFC process Tad McClellan