Re: Continued RFC process

[Tad McClellan]

On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 03:42:48PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 12:31 PM 10/10/00 -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >     Dan> A better analogy is that Larry's the Bishop and Chief
> >     Dan> Architect, while the rest of us are engineers, sectional
> >     Dan> architects, artisans, craftsmen, journeymen, and apprentices,
> >     Dan> working to build up a cathedral. (And yes, I do mean this
> >     Dan> analogy in the way you likely think I do, amongst other ways)
> >
> >Ooohh, Freemasonry comes to Perl.  Can I make up the handshake? :)
> 
> I was sort of hoping to go with Perl 6 Secred Decoder Rings, but a 
                                          ^   ^
                                          ^   ^
> handshake'd be keen too... :-)


Would that be a Sacred Decoder?

Would that be a Secret Decoder?


Maybe it's not even a typo.

Is it an attempt to create a new word so that you can be
enshrined in etymologies throughout the world?


-- 
    Tad McClellan                          SGML consulting
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]                     Perl programming
    Fort Worth, Texas