On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 12:19:38PM -0700, Peter Scott wrote: > Er, I don't get it. I'm proposing that if perl 6 determines it's been > given perl 5 code, it does "exec perl5 $0". So thereafter it's as though > perl 6 never existed as far as that code is concerned; whatever it wants to > do should be completely independent of any perl 6 code. So ... when a "perl6" program uses a "perl5" library, what happens? If we go with Larry's rule that a package declaration unambiguously says you're parsing perl 5, then this situation WILL exist. -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Uri Guttman
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Tim Bunce
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... John Porter
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Simon Cozens
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Edward Peschko
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Larry Wall
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 James Mastros
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Graham Barr
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Johan Vromans
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Paul Johnson
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Graham Barr
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens