On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 09:23:56AM -0400, John Porter wrote: > "Nothing can parse perl like Perl." Just saying it doesn't make it true, you know. -- Keep the number of passes in a compiler to a minimum. -- D. Gries
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Peter Scott
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Dan Sugalski
- RE: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... David Whipp
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Edward Peschko
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Uri Guttman
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Tim Bunce
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... John Porter
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Simon Cozens
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Edward Peschko
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Larry Wall
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 James Mastros
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens