On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 06:29:51PM +0200, Bart Lateur wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2001 17:05:31 +0100, Graham Barr wrote: > > >wantarray-ness is already passed along the call stack today. Thats > >the whole point of it. So what is the difference in passing a number > >instead of a boolean ? > > Because you might have a wantarray situation that expects no values? > > () = whateveryouwant(); I am sure that situation is handled by the 'want' RFC. I have not read it recently, but I suspect in this case want('LIST') would return that magical "0 but true" or something similar. > You can always expect one more than is on the LHS. > > How is this currently handled with split()? split is special cased when it's assignment is directly to a list of known length. The current perl does not pass wanted list lengths around. Graham.
- Please make "last" work in "grep&quo... Alexander Farber (EED)
- Re: Please make "last" work in "... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Please make "last" work in &... Graham Barr
- Re: Please make "last" work in &... John Porter
- Re: Please make "last" work in &... Larry Wall
- Re: Please make "last" work ... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Please make "last" w... Graham Barr
- Re: Please make "last&qu... Uri Guttman
- Re: Please make "las... Graham Barr
- Re: Please make "... Bart Lateur
- Re: Please make "... Graham Barr
- Re: Please make "... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Please make "... Bart Lateur
- Re: Please make "... Damian Conway
- Re: Please make "... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Please make "... Larry Wall
- Re: Please make "... Larry Wall
- Re: Please make "... Damian Conway
- Re: Please make "... David L. Nicol
- Re: Please make "last" w... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: Please make "last&qu... David L. Nicol