On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 05:36:11PM +0100, Graham Barr wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 06:29:51PM +0200, Bart Lateur wrote: > > On Wed, 2 May 2001 17:05:31 +0100, Graham Barr wrote: > > > > >wantarray-ness is already passed along the call stack today. Thats > > >the whole point of it. So what is the difference in passing a number > > >instead of a boolean ? > > > > Because you might have a wantarray situation that expects no values? > > > > () = whateveryouwant(); > > I am sure that situation is handled by the 'want' RFC. I have not > read it recently, but I suspect in this case want('LIST') would > return that magical "0 but true" or something similar. Hopefully the "something similar", I hope in Perl 6 we will able to bury the "0 but true" workaround to the backyard on a moonless night :-) -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep"... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep... Graham Barr
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep... John Porter
- Re: Please make "last" work in "grep... Larry Wall
- Re: Please make "last" work in "... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Please make "last" work in &q... Graham Barr
- Re: Please make "last" work i... Uri Guttman
- Re: Please make "last" w... Graham Barr
- Re: Please make "last&quo... Bart Lateur
- Re: Please make "last&quo... Graham Barr
- Re: Please make "last&quo... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Please make "last&quo... Bart Lateur
- Re: Please make "last&quo... Damian Conway
- Re: Please make "last&quo... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Please make "last&quo... Larry Wall
- Re: Please make "last&quo... Larry Wall
- Re: Please make "last&quo... Damian Conway
- Re: Please make "last&quo... David L. Nicol
- Re: Please make "last" work in &q... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: Please make "last" work i... David L. Nicol
- Re: Please make "last" work in "... H . Merijn Brand